The point he was getting at was about the charisma of the speaker, not really about the content of their words, which is irrelevant. Whether or not you agree wi

The point he was getting at was about the charisma of the speaker, not really about the content of their words, which is irrelevant. Whether or not you agree with Trump is orthogonal to whether or not he has actionable charisma. It is fairly evident that Zuckerberg does not inspire with his words; they feel contrived in a way that makes you wonder if he really believes what he is saying. On the other hand, Trump has conviction, even if his point of view is not something you agree with. Zuckerberg has no conviction in his speech at all, and that makes him difficult to trust. One cannot reasonably trust a man who appears to have no trust in himself.