4 ms·
You need a headless CMS like Contentful[0]. They have a free developer tier which is great for static sites, especially when you pair it with the super awesome
by shaqbert 9y ago
You need a headless CMS like Contentful[0]. They have a free developer tier which is great for static sites, especially when you pair it with the super awesome React based static site generator GatsbyJS[1].
[0]: https://www.contentful.com/ https://www.contentful.com/
[1]: https://www.gatsbyjs.org/docs/gatsby-starters/ https://www.gatsbyjs.org/docs/gatsby-starters/
- __bee 9y agowould go with Ghost or Hosted Jekyll, `Contentful` is not a good solution for individual/small/medium teams.
- dgreensp 9y agoWhy not?
- gitgud 9y agoI'm not familiar with the service, why isn't a it good for individual/small/medium teams?
- jdavis703 9y agoI was an early user of Contentful. Before I introduced it, we had non-techies editing YAML or Markdown files and committing them to Git and deploying them using Jenkins (yeah that went about as well as you'd expect). After countless hours supporting this system I decided to move over a couple of the content pages to Contentful (here's one example: https://issuu.com/m/success/madsounds https://issuu.com/m/success/madsounds). I didn't need to support anyone after making that move. As techies we tend to think things like Git are easy, but it's not (that's part of the reason we get paid the big bucks( Also eventually basically all the company's CMS needs were moved over to Contentful. From my experience it scaled well for both small and medium-sized teams.
- nvus 9y agoI want to upvote you more.