3 ms·

I think its a good take. The problem its hard when not social media to get visibility. Its easy to start a blog (wordpress/blogger/tumblr etc.. ), its harder

I think its a good take. The problem its hard when not social media to get visibility. Its easy to start a blog (wordpress/blogger/tumblr etc.. ), its harder to get people to go to it and periodically check it out. RSS aggregators/ google reader was a good way to do this, but they've fallen out of favor. There is a ghost town of abandoned blogs on the internet presumably because they didn't get the reads/ interaction. Its almost like you need to announce your new blogpost on twitter/ fb.. But I think there are solutions. I saw this open source groupware on hn a while back and am starting to get in installed for an art non-profit. There are probably others, but I'm going install and see how it goes: https://www.agorakit.org/en/ https://www.agorakit.org/en/

owly 9y ago
Please post about your experience on hn once you have it implemented. It will be valuable to the community and generate discussion for other options.
cilefen 9y ago
https://indieweb.org/ https://indieweb.org/ lays out techniques for getting the word out when you publish a blog.
- eitland 9y ago
  Or one could just wrote because on wants to write, want to share knowledge and not to "build and audience" or anything.
  - togetherasone 9y ago
    I agree with this sentiment. Yet, it seems instinctive to suggest that the internet wasn't made to be exploited by those wishing to monetize it. I just think we've let the presence of large tech companies pervert this concept. Absent such groups, it would seem to be desirable to let individuals monetize work which makes them happy. In such a web, it would be more akin to a street marketplace, as opposed to, say, a curated set of goods.
togetherasone 9y ago
"The problem its hard when not social media to get visibility." So the matter we must take up is that of equal opportunity for those wishing to increase their readership, (whether for influence or monetary reasons)? That's my interpretation. In this sense, are Google and many other "given" sites on the web a barrier to having a conversation about such measures, because of their power?
- acomjean 9y ago
  I think good visibility to quality content is the problem. Maybe why many of us are here on HN to get interesting content not on our social platform. Google would seem to want this a more open web. I suspect they're starting to fear everyone using Facebook for everything, thus investing in Wordpress. Though they haven't been big supporters of their own blogging platform. A lot of the social media Giants like you to keep your content on their own site, basically the longer your on Facebook/twitter the more ads they can show you. Google drops ads all over the web (except Facebook and twitter) so they don't care where you go.

owly 9y ago

Please post about your experience on hn once you have it implemented. It will be valuable to the community and generate discussion for other options.

cilefen 9y ago

https://indieweb.org/ https://indieweb.org/ lays out techniques for getting the word out when you publish a blog.

eitland 9y ago
Or one could just wrote because on wants to write, want to share knowledge and not to "build and audience" or anything.
- togetherasone 9y ago
  I agree with this sentiment. Yet, it seems instinctive to suggest that the internet wasn't made to be exploited by those wishing to monetize it. I just think we've let the presence of large tech companies pervert this concept. Absent such groups, it would seem to be desirable to let individuals monetize work which makes them happy. In such a web, it would be more akin to a street marketplace, as opposed to, say, a curated set of goods.

togetherasone 9y ago

"The problem its hard when not social media to get visibility." So the matter we must take up is that of equal opportunity for those wishing to increase their readership, (whether for influence or monetary reasons)? That's my interpretation. In this sense, are Google and many other "given" sites on the web a barrier to having a conversation about such measures, because of their power?

acomjean 9y ago
I think good visibility to quality content is the problem. Maybe why many of us are here on HN to get interesting content not on our social platform. Google would seem to want this a more open web. I suspect they're starting to fear everyone using Facebook for everything, thus investing in Wordpress. Though they haven't been big supporters of their own blogging platform. A lot of the social media Giants like you to keep your content on their own site, basically the longer your on Facebook/twitter the more ads they can show you. Google drops ads all over the web (except Facebook and twitter) so they don't care where you go.