3 ms·
Do wonder how much of that was from code having adopted GNU-isms...
by digi_owl 9y ago
Do wonder how much of that was from code having adopted GNU-isms...
- pleasestopthis 9y agohonestly not that much since adopting a GNU-ism or Glibc-ism will in most case result in errors at compile-time.
- ktta 9y agoNope. This 'self is the standard' way of GNU software is one reason I'm not a big fan of GNU. https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc...
- pleasestopthis 9y agoWe are referring to buggyness during execution (what the parent of the comment i'm responding to says) while most problems with GNU-isms come hit you at compile-time.
- ktta 9y agoAlmost all of it. Musl AFAIK strongly sticks to the standard. It is one of the biggest things holding back wider adoption. Similar to the dependence between the linux kernel and GCC. Clang should work but linux also has the 'GNUisms' so deep there a big project called LLVMlinux to correct it.