Your laborious sarcasm completely misses the point of the article. Nobody is wishing for "old technology" or yesterday's methods. That is not the subject. I do

Your laborious sarcasm completely misses the point of the article. Nobody is wishing for "old technology" or yesterday's methods. That is not the subject. I don't find the guardian article very interesting, it has it's own problems with a click-baity title. But your response simply loops over an irrelevant shopping list of "my favourite things about the internet".