3 ms·
He is not describing SJWs, which is a fairly modern concept and usually used idiotically by people who don't have the brain power to understand issue X. He's t
by mung 9y ago
He is not describing SJWs, which is a fairly modern concept and usually used idiotically by people who don't have the brain power to understand issue X.
He's talking about those that might describe themselves as moral majority. People that get described as SJWs are usually arguing against oppression. By contrast, oppressors will happily force their morals on others (but not always themselves) and tell you that it's for your own good. Usually backed by some religious doctrine.
- justAnotherNET 9y agoIn my experience “SJWs” have their own religion and overwhelmingly seek out moderator positions on subreddits, forums, positions on the school paper’s editorial team, etc etc as their ideology fails when faced with the free flow of information. You can see this in just about any internet community, the only ones that are “left wing” are the ones that enforce strict moderation rules. Anything open course corrects right very fast. The “Warrior” in SJW comes from their perpetual fight to ban, shadowban, moderate, de-rank, and delist opposing views. You can deflect by suggesting these people are simply authoritarian, and not true social justice/left wing advocates. I would challenge you to investigate everything from reddit’s super mods to Wikipedia’s editor cartels. You’ll find they systematically infiltrate open communities and once in positions of power purge opposing views from leadership and begin to enforce ideological conformity. The people doing this are exclusively left wing soc jus types. Outside of the internet I’ve seen this behavior in academia as well. It’s pretty amazing how downright fascist some of them will get when they think they’re in like company.
- cup-of-tea 9y agoI think your understanding of the term "SJW" is out of date. SJW now refers to someone who forces their morals on other people and advocate silencing and censorship to achieve this. He is describing these people.
- hueving 9y ago>usually used idiotically by people who don't have the brain power Please don't sink to this level >People that get described as SJWs are usually arguing against oppression That might be your description but many also include the people going around to open source projects to change the genders of code comments while simultaneously accusing the project of being sexist at the same time. They might be against oppression but their approach is so misguided it's destructive.
- praptak 9y agoThe behavior you described is a) merely annoying and easy to curb and b) far from omnipresent. OPs quote was about censorship enforced by state. I don't see how this is even remotely same caliber.
- singularity2001 9y agoI'm not aware of the meaning of the three letter acronym and I'm not planning to learn it. willfullingly ignorant if you will
- ralusek 9y agoSJWs protest free speech events, advocate for hate-speech bans, advocate for compelled speech patterns in Canada, prevent conservative speakers for giving lectures on college campuses, among a litany of other such behaviors. They are largely moral authoritarians. Of course the Evangelical conservatives are no different, but this quote is absolutely applicable to the American left.