> You've moved the target. You said it was all PR, it isn't. ...when did I say that? What i've said, consistently, is that it's unclear from the evidence prese

> You've moved the target. You said it was all PR, it isn't. ...when did I say that? What i've said, consistently, is that it's unclear from the evidence presented whether they targeted older workers, or whether they chose some legitimate axis along which to fire people that happens to correlate with age. Like high salaries, or lack of expertise in newer technologies. You responded saying that their PR strategy is evidence that it was specifically about age. That's the only context in which PR has come up, and I still don't see how it proves or otherwise susbtantiates the connection.