3 ms·
You are making it sound like I argued against standards, that's not the case. Yes, ability to audit the code is paramount, and I want to go that direction for e
by jakeogh 9y ago
You are making it sound like I argued against standards, that's not the case. Yes, ability to audit the code is paramount, and I want to go that direction for everything. We are merging with our creations, people have their noses so far in their phones they are starting to head mount and have it overlay their field of view. Without source access, we wont even be able to check if our own experiences are real.
Relying on experts to audit things is obvious and correct, but they must be "anyone", not just a select few that get to see the details. Maybe I am not qualified to evaluate something, but that is never a reason to prevent me from looking at the same information the experts have, in fact that's how those experts came to be.
The fact that some people don't care is irrelevant. They get tricked, and learn. Consider how many people are re-evaluating what FB even _is_ right now.
- cctt23 9y agoMuch as I appreciate you responding to only the first sentence of my reply, I’m going to have to point out that your FOSS rant is only tangentially related to what I said, mate.
- jakeogh 9y agoHere, I'll address your EULA point, if you follow your own suggestion and respond to the "rant" I made which you walked right by: "The alternative goes right to rules that prevent everyone (not just FB) from remembering things, and ultimately more censorship."