3 ms·
So you accept the notion of allowed speech, but maybe disagree on where the line goes. That's fine, and something different from the people complaining that naz
by SiempreViernes 9y ago
So you accept the notion of allowed speech, but maybe disagree on where the line goes. That's fine, and something different from the people complaining that nazis should be allowed to preach about the destruction of the negro because after all "that's just an opinion".
- jerkstate 9y agoCredible or actual harm is useable as a legal standard. If you wanted to outlaw "hate speech" what standard could be used to do that? How could you prevent abuse of those laws in order to suppress unpopular or otherwise subversive speech? In other words, it might sound like a good idea, but there's absolutely no way to prevent a legal standard that does not stem from actual or credible harm from being abused by the powerful to suppress the powerless.
- mr_toad 9y agoThe US government doesn’t need hate speech laws to abuse & suppress unpopular speech, the just use national security laws: http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/enc_federal_bureau_of_investigation_fbi/ http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/encycloped...