> But we're certainly not at the point where it's even approaching the accuracy of a human being. You say that like it's an end of the world show stopping bug.

> But we're certainly not at the point where it's even approaching the accuracy of a human being. You say that like it's an end of the world show stopping bug. There's no reason a company can't have a process for handling those mistakes. > False positives and false negatives abound. When that means the service I pay for as a backup starts deleting my innocent content because it thought it was porn, that's when I leave that tool and never come back. And go where? If everybody has to filter content then they'll all have those issues.