Ah I see, I think it's a case of ambigious copy being misinterpreted by some of us: "Tech Companies That Won't Delete Your Information Services with the highes

Ah I see, I think it's a case of ambigious copy being misinterpreted by some of us: "Tech Companies That Won't Delete Your Information Services with the highest scores have the worst policies" I read this as 20 is worse than 1. Maybe something along these lines, explicitly explaining 1 is the worse. "Tech Companies That Won't Delete Your Information Services. Those with the highest rank have the worst policies. A rank of 1 is the worst offender" I think this is somewhat a problem of English missing a term that unambiguously means "1 is highest".