3 ms·
Thanks! We were really lucky in that the Santa Clara city system was still using analog voice channels with lots of bandwidth (20K0F3E). If you check out the
by rachelbythebay 9y ago
Thanks! We were really lucky in that the Santa Clara city system was still using analog voice channels with lots of bandwidth (20K0F3E). If you check out the SVRCS system that replaced it (and I also logged for a few years), the audio quality is a lot worse. Super-compressed audio which then gets crammed through /another/ codec (MP3) isn't great.
I will admit that I actually listened to the original system a lot with headphones, so I had every reason to fine-tune it until it sounded as awesome as possible. If you go back far enough into 2011, you can find a bunch of calls with terrible audio before I figured out the finer points of squelch, tuning errors, and 48 vs. 44.1 kHz :-)
I haven't decided whether it's worth building another system now that I have time to actually listen again. Hmm...
- wglb 9y agoI would vote for a new one! (I love all your posts!)
- xvf22 9y agoWhen I lived near the airport I made an ACARS monitoring box with the B200 and GR. Had a bunch of fun analyzing engine performance data and the funny messages going back and forth. Travelling with my rtlsdr has saved my butt a few times. Always nice being the first to know that a flight has been cancelled.