3 ms·
The article clearly mentions that they had to punish someone. Also, China imposed harsh consequences in the form of lost revenue for Marriott due to the liked t
by sah2ed 9y ago
The article clearly mentions that they had to punish someone. Also, China imposed harsh consequences in the form of lost revenue for Marriott due to the liked tweet:
"China forced Marriott to suspend all online booking for a week at its nearly 300 Chinese hotels. A Chinese leader also demanded the company publicly apologize and “seriously deal with the people responsible,” the Journal reported."
- Lazare 9y ago> The article clearly mentions that they had to punish someone. ...well, no. They had a choice. They didn't have to fire the guy. > Also, China imposed harsh consequences in the form of lost revenue for Marriott True. But no one is imposing any consequences on Marriott for firing the guy, harsh or not. For Marriott, that makes the decision easy I suppose. It does not, however, change what's right.