3 ms·
What a shitty headline and article itself. The much better idea to consider is that people are re-creating (re-constructing) their traumatic memories again and
by c00p3r 16y ago
What a shitty headline and article itself.
The much better idea to consider is that people are re-creating (re-constructing) their traumatic memories again and again, unable (or unwilling in some part) to let them go. So, what they get is a recollection stored on top of recollection and so on. When we re-construct the memory we re-create it and then store (alter) the result.
I think I can remember my own childhood traumas (I had many) but what I actually can fetch from my memory is the reconstruction I used to have.
The cognitive therapy is working exactly because I can alter (re-frame) my memories, by reconstructing them, altering them and storing back. In particular I can reduce the intensity of the emotional "color" attached to my reconstruction. I had such and such crap. Ok, no problem. It's done and it's gone.
In Buddhist terms it sound as "the karma is already applied" - your past personality was already changed by those events, but since then you got a lot of another changes. Actually, any thought alters you, and that is why Buddhist people says that thought and deeds are the same. Your thought actually is a your deed.
- Symmetry 16y agoI'm not sure that anything you're saying there contradicts what was in the article (or the headline), though thank you for detailing what the article calls just "new therapies that work". The article seems to have been written in the context of the numerous people who have been sent to jail solely on the testimony of people who thought they had repressed memories which psychotherapists were able to recover. See wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_ritual_abuse http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_ritual_abuse