I don't have many data points on Seattle, but I'm reminded of this article from a couple years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12459698 https://news.y

I don't have many data points on Seattle, but I'm reminded of this article from a couple years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12459698 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12459698 Seattle was also one of those cities hostile to jitneys. http://mynorthwest.com/152499/political-promise-personal-vehicles-spelled-doom-for-seattles-jitneys/ http://mynorthwest.com/152499/political-promise-personal-veh...? So my impression is that Seattle often jumps the gun regulating things away--banning things that actually increase quality of life/spending power. We all know that those without discretionary income are the first to feel drops in spending power (due to regulation, etc.). I'm also reminded of a great chapter in "Downtown: Its Rise and Fall" which talks about the special interests behind and the consequences of tenement reform, consequences which were largely negative if you were poor. I can't help wondering if similar forces have led to Seattle's present-day predicaments.