the numbers on this are much less impressive than the headline would suggest - we're talking results that depend on singletons. the treatment is also not reall

the numbers on this are much less impressive than the headline would suggest - we're talking results that depend on singletons. the treatment is also not really properly controlled, since they don't have a condition which includes rats receiving the same SAR but in some, presumably non-threatening frequency. that is, what if the effects are simply a result of any rat that is RF heated? IMO, it's telling that although they tested a ramp of increasing SAR, they can't claim proportionate incidence, or even monotonically increasing with SAR.