4 ms·
I hate to be "that guy", but that website is incredibly annoying for what amounts to a few paragraphs of text. Not everything needs to be animated.
by AndrewStephens 9y ago
I hate to be "that guy", but that website is incredibly annoying for what amounts to a few paragraphs of text. Not everything needs to be animated.
- sp332 9y agoThis is a very popular Blogger theme. It might even be the default.
- fuck_google 9y agoDesign by Google
- scrollaway 9y agoIf anyone out there either is able to self-host their blog, or can afford a few bucks a month for it, I recommend Ghost (https://ghost.org https://ghost.org). Example blog: https://blog.ghost.org https://blog.ghost.org Open source customizable markdown blog engine, with great themes by default. I feel like it doesn't get enough attention.
- tambre 9y agoSeems to have no IPv6 support. I'd prefer to be able to access other peoples' blogs and have my own blog accessible at all times.
- scrollaway 9y agoSend their Pro team a feature request. Either way you have the option to self-host it, which is why I'm promoting this here. If you want IPv6, it's super easy.
- johnonolan 9y agoHey! Ghost(Pro) is targeted mainly at business users who want a solid managed service, but there's absolutely no downside to self-hosting. We don't do any feature-gating, so you get the same software no matter where you want to run it. Easiest way to get up and running on your own env. is with Digital Ocean, who have a 1-click image: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-the-digitalocean-ghost-one-click-application-for-ubuntu-16-04 https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-... If you want to just test it out locally first, that's easy too - https://docs.ghost.org/docs/install-local https://docs.ghost.org/docs/install-local TLDR: npm install ghost-cli -g && ghost install local
- scrollaway 9y agoSince you're here I just want to say that I love the operation you guys run. Ghost is great, the pro service is great and the open source, transparent development of the engine itself as well as the company/foundation is fantastic. You guys are up there with Gitlab as a model of how open source businesses should work.
- dingdingdang 9y agoThanks for being "that guy": it is awful & even ublock can't filter the particular issues out since the nonsensical blogger theme is embeddded left and right in both inline and external scripts..etc.
- jakeogh 9y agoI cant tell because it requires JS to even render the text.
- nh2 9y agoBlogger even blocks the "Go back one page" (Alt+Left / mouse side button) for me. Visitor, you better stay.
- kzrdude 9y agoIt's not wrong to be that guy, if the page design is the top discussion topic then the design has failed and gotten in the way of the content.
- sgiratch 9y agoIf only it at least supported the Firefox Reading Mode I could tolerate anything, but as this doesn't ...
- guiambros 9y agoPrinter Friendly [1] is useful in sites like this. It removes all formatting, making it easy to read (and print, save to PDF, etc). And if you're printing or saving, you can easily delete blocks of content (like photos, diagrams, etc). Strongly recommended. You can use either a bookmarklet or install the browser extension. [1] https://www.printfriendly.com/ https://www.printfriendly.com/ edit: seems this site traps mouse scrolls, so you can't scroll the page when using PF. What a shitty implementation! It works well saving to PDF tho.
- boundlessdreamz 9y agoIt has scroll but inside the content box. Does the scroll bar not show for you?
- guiambros 9y agoHmm, I can see the scroll bars, but seems wheel mouse scroll only works in some pages. E.g., no scroll on NYT [1], but it works on Wikipedia [2]. Interestingly, the Chrome extension is a lot more stable than the bookmarklet. For example, the NYT page scrolls just fine using the Chrome extension (probably because changes the page, while the bookmarklet just creates an overlay on top of the existing page). Well, still has my vote as one of the most useful extensions. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/21/technology/personaltech/delete-facebook.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/21/technology/personaltech/d... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Chastain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica_Chastain
- SllX 9y agoI also hate to be "that guy" but this site is completely inaccessible with JavaScript disabled and lynx -dump doesn't dump the main text. That said if you would like to restore some sanity to your web browsing, you can pull up the Google cache for a lack of these supposed animations and based off what others in this thread are saying, fully retain proper scrolling and back button behavior. Best part is that it's a Google service for stripping the inanity of another Google service. Enjoy.
- codedokode 9y agoI agree. It is just a page with text, why add tons of Javascript just to render it? Well, it is made by Google, so no wonder they cannot just serve plain HTML page.
- codedokode 9y agoAlso they block scale change on mobile devices: <meta content='initial-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0, user-scalable=no