4 ms·

> If humans develop technology that allows hydrogen fuel to be safely generated at the pumping station The technology to produce hydrogen from water at efficie

by eip 9y ago

> If humans develop technology that allows hydrogen fuel to be safely generated at the pumping station The technology to produce hydrogen from water at efficiencies far exceeding Faraday has been known since the 1970s. It was perfected in the 1990s. Toyota has been sitting on it for two decades. That's why they are still leaning towards fuel cells. Permanent batteries were also developed in the 1970s. They are currently in use by the military. The problem isn't technology and hasn't been for a long time. The problem is the international slavery system runs on oil and will for the foreseeable future.

tzakrajs 9y ago
> The technology to produce hydrogen from water at efficiencies far exceeding I was talking about safety and locality of generating hydrogen fuel, and I am sure that whatever advance you are talking about from thirty years ago is captured in the numbers I referenced. > Permanent batteries were also developed in the 1970s. They are currently in use by the military. Neat, but not relevant to my assertion. > The problem isn't technology and hasn't been for a long time. So you are saying that the reason we can't have hydrogen safely generated in pumping stations is because Toyota has some sort of patent or other rights that restrict its use? > The problem is the international slavery system runs on oil and will for the foreseeable future. How is Toyota benefiting from oil over hydrogen fuel cell?
- eip 9y ago
  > I was talking about safety and locality of generating hydrogen fuel Hydrogen can be produced on demand from water in a vehicle. > So you are saying that the reason we can't have hydrogen safely generated in pumping stations is because Toyota has some sort of patent or other rights that restrict its use? No. I am saying that any attempt to sell technology that would allow decentralized energy production is considered a threat to the stability of the international monetary (petro dollar / slavery) system and will be treated accordingly. > How is Toyota benefiting from oil over hydrogen fuel cell? They are not. But if they try to sell their water fuel tech their executives will be killed and their factories will be bombed to dust.

by eip 9y ago

tzakrajs 9y ago

> The technology to produce hydrogen from water at efficiencies far exceeding I was talking about safety and locality of generating hydrogen fuel, and I am sure that whatever advance you are talking about from thirty years ago is captured in the numbers I referenced. > Permanent batteries were also developed in the 1970s. They are currently in use by the military. Neat, but not relevant to my assertion. > The problem isn't technology and hasn't been for a long time. So you are saying that the reason we can't have hydrogen safely generated in pumping stations is because Toyota has some sort of patent or other rights that restrict its use? > The problem is the international slavery system runs on oil and will for the foreseeable future. How is Toyota benefiting from oil over hydrogen fuel cell?

eip 9y ago
> I was talking about safety and locality of generating hydrogen fuel Hydrogen can be produced on demand from water in a vehicle. > So you are saying that the reason we can't have hydrogen safely generated in pumping stations is because Toyota has some sort of patent or other rights that restrict its use? No. I am saying that any attempt to sell technology that would allow decentralized energy production is considered a threat to the stability of the international monetary (petro dollar / slavery) system and will be treated accordingly. > How is Toyota benefiting from oil over hydrogen fuel cell? They are not. But if they try to sell their water fuel tech their executives will be killed and their factories will be bombed to dust.