3 ms·
Is that not racism? I was under the understanding that racism was treating people differently based on race. There's intersectionalist arguments about how some
by lovich 9y ago
Is that not racism? I was under the understanding that racism was treating people differently based on race. There's intersectionalist arguments about how some kinds of privelages balance out other problems when you compare two separate groups of people, but I dont know that I've seen anyone argue that treating someone differently based on their race is not racism
- BadassFractal 9y agoRemember that, according to those theories, it's not racism+sexism to treat white males differently from other combinations of XY chromosomes and melanin levels. They are the oppressors, and victims of oppression can never do "reverse racism" against the oppressing class. That's called bringing justice. Equity and retribution over equality. It was perfectly moral to crush and marginalize kulaks, suppress the intelligentsia. Just history repeating.