3 ms·
So would you say the side effects of banning Assault Rifles have been negligible? And what would you say of the potential side effects of SESTA/FOSTA?
by mattnewton 9y ago
So would you say the side effects of banning Assault Rifles have been negligible?
And what would you say of the potential side effects of SESTA/FOSTA?
- nybble41 9y agoMore to the point, the intended effects of banning Assault Rifles have been negligible—and not nearly sufficient to justify even minor side effects.
- pythonista-rf 9y agoWeapons ban tend to have a hidden motive, or are emotional reflexes. Even with all strict laws, California led on the number of murders in 2016 (https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-12 https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-...). SESTA/FOSTA could be a stepping stone to prohibit more free speech. It's insane that we see constant attacks on the first and second amendment by the government, all in one month.