2 ms·

Not defending, but maybe explaining... A HN headline yesterday explained which licenses were prohibited by Google: https://opensource.google.com/docs/thirdpar

Not defending, but maybe explaining... A HN headline yesterday explained which licenses were prohibited by Google: https://opensource.google.com/docs/thirdparty/licenses/#banned https://opensource.google.com/docs/thirdparty/licenses/#bann... Most of the licenses on the Mozilla page are either restricted or banned at Google, based on a cursory crosscheck. https://voice.mozilla.org/en/data https://voice.mozilla.org/en/data

ocdtrekkie 9y ago
Note that the other licenses listed lower on that page are for other data sets. Mozilla's data is CC0, which shouldn't be a problem for Google, because it doesn't include the "noncommercial" part. Text of CC0 for discussion purposes, is here: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode CC0 appears to have most of the legal text expected in a proper license including clear allowance of modification and distribution, and lack of warranty or liability.