I'd strongly argue that my view isn't about being ideal, it's the minimum. Fact: We don't know what they do with our data Fact: They refuse to show us what th

I'd strongly argue that my view isn't about being ideal, it's the minimum. Fact: We don't know what they do with our data Fact: They refuse to show us what they do with our data, even though they could Fact: They have taken actions that, while I obviously don't have direct evidence of this, looks extremely like they are handing over control of other people's data to someone else, who is known to be abusive with it Fact: They can design their system in a way that avoids all of this, yet they continually choose not to All of this points in one direction, and there's very little evidence pointing in the other direction. It seems pretty obvious to me that their pro-privacy standpoint is all just smoke and mirrors. I'm sure they care to some extent, but they clearly value money over their user's privacy. If I say that I care about my health, but I eat terrible quality foods, don't exercise, and ignore people who try to encourage me to be healthier, then it it obvious that I don't care about my health, despite what I say.