4 ms·
"It has become clear to be that the internet is naturally monopolistic in a way physical institutions are not. One simply cannot move their gun channel, or the
by rsync 9y ago
"It has become clear to be that the internet is naturally monopolistic in a way physical institutions are not. One simply cannot move their gun channel, or the cigar trading forum to other sites and have a decent chance of maintaining even 10% of their customers."
That's funny - I thought that exactly the opposite was true.
The Internet (not particular sites, not AOL or "the facebook", but The Internet) is naturally un-monopolistic because you can, in fact, just move your video channel to your own website and do whatever you'd like there.
In fact, it's trivially easy to do so - you can probably accomplish the entire task using only your telephone.
If you feel that this is not the case I think you've made yourself fragile to services and processes that have nothing to do with The Internet.
- avhon1 9y agoIt takes a lot more time, expertise, and money to run a website (even a simple wordpress site) than to upload videos to youtube.
- probably_wrong 9y agoYou are right about that. And yet, the alternative seems to be "I want to exercise my constitutional rights, but I want a private company to make it easy, fight for me when legal problems arise, and foot the bill".