3 ms·
We know for a fact many of the emails are true, and there are no claims that specific ones are false as far as I remember. Reasonable to conclude that the batch
by dahdum 9y ago
We know for a fact many of the emails are true, and there are no claims that specific ones are false as far as I remember. Reasonable to conclude that the batch was accurate until claims from the senders and recipients otherwise.
Podesta had the same argument about tampering IIRC.
Ask yourself if you would be questioning RNC leaks by a foreign power the same way. I would.
- Taniwha 9y agoI would too, but I'd still assume the RNC is truthful over the KGB
- stale2002 9y agoYes, I would say the same for the democratic party. But in order for me to believe them, they have to ACTUALLY make a claim. They have to say "This email right here is false". If they do not say that, then I will assume that they believe all of them to be true. And no, vague insinuations of "It could have been doctored!" do not count as a claim. I will believe them if they point to a specific email or fact that they believe to be untrue. But so far they have made so such claims, so there is nothing for me to believe them on.