> this is not self-evident Self-evident is just a lazy term meaning I believe it without evidence. You could for example, be living in the matrix and the real

> this is not self-evident Self-evident is just a lazy term meaning I believe it without evidence. You could for example, be living in the matrix and the real world could operate under different art of rules or maybe no rules. Science puts these types of questions aside for expediency > taste, for example, has no discernible rules. therefore taste is irrational Not true. Some of what is called taste can be boiled down to rational analysis. For example, photogeaphers have rules which helps them take good photos On a fundamental level, science and rationality depends on premises unproven. It is a great tool to examine the universe and it nature, but that does not mean it can answer every question. It was never intended to