What kind of fierce debate are you looking for? Without having read any of these papers myself ... I suspect Turing’s Test is a topic that lends itself to phil

What kind of fierce debate are you looking for? Without having read any of these papers myself ... I suspect Turing’s Test is a topic that lends itself to philosophical debate and is accessible to non experts. With most modern papers the most likely source of debate is their assumptions and methodology. For instance, you can probably read any number of machine learning papers which follow the format of (data set -> result on that set) and critique their methodology. (Basically, for this category of debate, if you’re not finding problems you’re not thinking hard enough.) I don’t know what people write about in the fields of HCI, VR and AR but there’s probably lots of stuff to debate about their assumptions there. Or you could go for the bitcoin paper which is at a unique intersection of CS, economics and game theory. There’s shockingly little intelligent writing on this topic.