3 ms·
In fact this is exactly the argument many of the framers had against the bill of rights — that they were so natural and inherently obviously not to be infringed
by zaroth 9y ago
In fact this is exactly the argument many of the framers had against the bill of rights — that they were so natural and inherently obviously not to be infringed that listing a few of them might make people think anything that might have been left out was not in fact a natural right of the people!
Can’t say how glad I am they decided it better to put a few key ones down on paper. Imagine if “they are so natural as to go unwritten” had won the day?