4 ms·
That's an interesting read. To be clear, the tariff rate on durable goods was increased from 40% to 59% in 1932. [1] That seems like a far cry from what we're
by redm 9y ago
That's an interesting read. To be clear, the tariff rate on durable goods was increased from 40% to 59% in 1932. [1] That seems like a far cry from what we're talking about here.
It's my understanding these tariffs are levied against a single country (China) who is (widely believed to be) manipulating trade to their benefit and engaged in widespread IP theft.
If the former is true, the tariffs (to me, a non-economist) don't seem terrible. Perhaps you can further elaborate on why a focused and limited tariff targeted to a single country is such a bad idea?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot%E2%80%93Hawley_Tariff_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot%E2%80%93Hawley_Tariff_Ac...
- pishpash 9y agoI don't think $60B matters a whole lot. The issue is always if it escalates. It's pulling the lever of economic sanction over mainly political disagreements (voters who support the optics), a little distraction, if you will.