>And, it's high time we recognize these services to be "infrastructure". You don't persecute the street owner for vehicles that drive on it - if you could, the

>And, it's high time we recognize these services to be "infrastructure". You don't persecute the street owner for vehicles that drive on it - if you could, the state would be liable for all crimes involving a vehicle Sure, but a public street is state-owned. A public street agency doesn't profit from trying to convince the right kind of people to drive on it with the right kind of cars so it can market things to them or charge tolls. I oppose this law for the same reason as you, but it would be better to just admit that vital network infrastructure of the common-carrier kind shouldn't be reliant on feeding eyeballs to advertisers and manipulating users.