> Look at the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas. Whether or not you believe they had illegal guns, they had guns, and they died. Sure, but if you think they were

> Look at the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas. Whether or not you believe they had illegal guns, they had guns, and they died. Sure, but if you think they were alive, do you think they would have looked back at what happened, they would have seen this as their failure or victory? If Branch Dravidians didn't have guns, they would simply be arrested and forgotten in the history, whereas today they are folk heroes. If anything, to all the gun rights supporters, Waco shows that fighting with guns works. > Guns lose to tanks every time. Then how do you explain US-Vietnam war, Second Iraq war, Afghanistan(first with USSR and then with US). The USSR's Afghanistan war is a great example, the only thing we supplied the Mujahiddins was guns. Tanks only win centralized armies and we are very good with fighting centralized Armies (First Gulf war was a good example), however we SUCK at fighting decentralized forces. The only reason why we manage to defeat ISIS because ISIS got too centralized (and we got strong leadership), but keep in mind we have still not managed to win Iraq and a replacement of ISIS is in works.