3 ms·
Looking at pure numbers, when those are actual people, with lives and families, is the absolute wrong way to frame the question. "an omniscient (this is an sin
by s73v3r_ 9y ago
Looking at pure numbers, when those are actual people, with lives and families, is the absolute wrong way to frame the question.
"an omniscient (this is an sincere attempt to stop people from avoiding the question being asked) being would judge the younger employee to have objectively superior cost/benefits to the company."
There's no evidence that's true in the least.
"In other words, for the context of this particular question only, the older work does NOT offer experience-based value superior to the younger worker."
You might as well be asking about unikitties, then.
- Slansitartop 9y ago> Looking at pure numbers, when those are actual people, with lives and families, is the absolute wrong way to frame the question. It's sad, but so many people on HN seem to think their Econ 101 textbook was teaching them ethics and morality.