The government chartered the corporation that is engaging in the censorship, and granted its owners limited liability. Strip away the privileges, and I wouldn'

The government chartered the corporation that is engaging in the censorship, and granted its owners limited liability. Strip away the privileges, and I wouldn't feel it necessary to impose additional obligations. In my personal opinion, corporations chartered by a government cannot engage in acts forbidden to that government. If you want to exercise your rights as a natural person, you must be prepared to accept full responsibility for the consequences of your actions. If you want to shield yourself from those consequences through a fictional entity, then follow the rassafrassin' rules. The US government is forbidden from restricting free speech, and so its corporations should not be engaging in viewpoint-based discrimination on that portion of their private property that they have explicitly opened as a public forum. If you allow the public into your space, you have to respect their rights.