> That's a senseless digression though. In terms of your agenda, it might make no sense. It just irks me when I see simplistic assumptions about human informat

> That's a senseless digression though. In terms of your agenda, it might make no sense. It just irks me when I see simplistic assumptions about human information processing that don't take the "situatedness" of the processor into account. I have no views, and did not attempt to comment, on machine information processing in this instance. I just wanted to point out that you can't simply go from the instructor's actually missing the inference as a passenger to the conclusion that they would have missed it as a driver. Thats it :)