3 ms·
As expected, the article seems to be a typical content marketing piece. If you're looking for real insights into evolutionary algorithms, specifically "neuroevo
by peterstoziek 9y ago
As expected, the article seems to be a typical content marketing piece. If you're looking for real insights into evolutionary algorithms, specifically "neuroevolution", I highly recommend to read this article: https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/neuroevolution-a-different-kind-of-deep-learning https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/neuroevolution-a-different-kin...
I enjoyed it much more than - what feels like - a quickly thrown together marketing piece with no real value for the reader.
- vanderZwan 9y agoThank you, saved it for later. Do you have any other links to offer?
- peterstoziek 9y agoUnfortunately not in this domain.
- ericjang 9y agoHere's a recent survey / observational science paper by some prominent "neuroevolution" / A-Life researchers. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03453 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03453. I found this refreshing because it's rare that science papers talk about the debugging and experimental process and debugging journeys underlying this research.
- ofrancon 9y agoA few links you can look at if you're interested in neuroevolution, from the same group of researchers: Ken Stanley and Risto Miikkulainen original NEAT (NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies) paper: http://nn.cs.utexas.edu/downloads/papers/stanley.ec02.pdf http://nn.cs.utexas.edu/downloads/papers/stanley.ec02.pdf Ken Stanley's novelty search page, and a link to his book, "Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective": http://eplex.cs.ucf.edu/noveltysearch/userspage/ http://eplex.cs.ucf.edu/noveltysearch/userspage/ Risto Miikkulainen's Evolving Deep Neural Networks paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00548 https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00548 Ken Stanley & team's work at Uber, with links to some recent papers: https://eng.uber.com/deep-neuroevolution/ https://eng.uber.com/deep-neuroevolution/
- yazr 9y agoAre these evolutionary techniques considered more or less sample-efficient (and or cpu-efficient) compared to DL with GD ??
- jamesblonde 9y agoNot quite a typical piece - it managed to make it to #2 on HN.
- John_KZ 9y agoI upvote links that promote discussion of interesting concepts, even if the article itself is really bad - like this one. I couldn't bother reading the original article, but designing neural networks via evolutionary algorithms is a very interesting concept I wasn't aware of.
- deepnet 9y agoThanks for the great link surveying Evolution and NEAT ( Neuroevolution of Neural Nets ) by Ken Stanley who pioneered the method. The OP is by Risto Miikkulainen who was Stanley's collaborator on NEAT and should not be summarily dismissed.
- rpm13 9y agoNote that this blog post is not an article per se, but an overview of a research website (https://sentient.ai/sentient-labs/ea https://sentient.ai/sentient-labs/ea) built around five new research papers. The website offers demos that illustrate neuroevolution and evolutionary computation concepts at a much more concrete level than the papers can.
- rpm13 9y agoFor a short intro to neuroevolution there is http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Neuroevolution http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Neuroevolution However, these overview articles do not include the newest research on evolving deep learning networks. Three such papers are introduced at https://www.sentient.ai/sentient-labs/ea-1/; https://www.sentient.ai/sentient-labs/ea-1/; there are other recent ones at https://research.googleblog.com/2018/03/using-evolutionary-automl-to-discover.html https://research.googleblog.com/2018/03/using-evolutionary-a... and https://eng.uber.com/deep-neuroevolution/ https://eng.uber.com/deep-neuroevolution/. It is a rapidly developing area.