3 ms·
It is an interest idea and a great starter for philosophical thinking, but no-one is treating it like literal gospel.
by tskaiser 9y ago
It is an interest idea and a great starter for philosophical thinking, but no-one is treating it like literal gospel.
- rhapsodic 9y ago>It is an interest idea and a great starter for philosophical thinking, but no-one is treating it like literal gospel. Of course not. "Gospel" is a religious concept. They're claiming that it's a plausible, scientifically-supportable theory. I don't think it's an interesting idea at all, nor do I think it's a good starter for philosophical thinking. I think it's Creationist nonsense.
- tskaiser 9y agoOkay.
- torstenvl 9y agoA "scientifically-supportable theory"* is one that describes a phenomenon that can be observed sufficiently to form a hypothesis and then test that hypothesis by experiment. In what way would you propose to test the simulation hypothesis by experiment? (* I'm assuming you're using the word "theory" loosely here.)
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]