3 ms·
All of those suggestions will increases cost and decrease profit, there's no law mandating any of those so why would they go above and beyond for 'safety' reaso
by ng-user 9y ago
All of those suggestions will increases cost and decrease profit, there's no law mandating any of those so why would they go above and beyond for 'safety' reasons?
I understand it's the ethical decision but at the end of the day for-profit companies are only interested in one thing: maximizing profits.
- Robin_Message 9y agoProfit maximisation is not the only factor of running a business, even a public company. But even given that, what are the PR and legal costs of this predictable [1] accident being made worse by a poor safety system? Plus the downtime on doing training/testing? And the probably harsher requirements that might now be enforced? Maximizing profits doesn't mean doing everything on the cheap. [1] in the sense there was likely to be an accident at some point.
- stordoff 9y agoRobin_Message basically says a lot of what I was thinking, but you also need to consider what maximises profits in the long term (and self driving cars are a long term project) - is it doing the minimum now to reduce costs, or is it taking all reasonable precautions to avoid the public perception building that self-driving cars are unsafe?