> If uber's software wasn't robust, why "test in production" when production could kill people? Because it's cheap. And Arizona lawmakers apparently don't do t

> If uber's software wasn't robust, why "test in production" when production could kill people? Because it's cheap. And Arizona lawmakers apparently don't do their job of protecting their citizens against a reckless company that is doing the classic "privatize profits, socialize losses" move, with "profits" being the improvements to their so-called self-driving car technology and "losses" being random people endangered and killed during the process of alpha-testing and debugging their technology in this nice testbed we call "city", which conveniently comes complete with irrationally acting humans that you don't even have to pay anything for serving as actors in your life-threatening test scenarios.