3 ms·

You mean teaching what not to do, I hope?

• thaumasiotes 9y ago
  Huh? The board was a major success, the only thing Theranos had going for it.
  • blueprint 9y ago
    Typically we pragmatists consider guiding the company to avoid implosion as a criterion for a successful board.
    • thaumasiotes 9y ago
      Once you've got a company with no product and you're committing fraud to stay alive, what would the point be of staffing a board to tell you to kill yourself? What would you get out of that? Do you think Theranos just didn't realize anything was wrong because the board didn't tell them?
• avs733 9y ago
  Its not about teaching what to do or not to do. Its about teaching how to evaluate what your company needs and what your board can provide. It's about vision and evaluation rather than correctness.