4 ms·

Man, Bloomberg is all over Zuck. I guess they've got an axe to grind after what he did to them with the newsfeed changes. It's interesting in that Zuck and Bloo

Man, Bloomberg is all over Zuck. I guess they've got an axe to grind after what he did to them with the newsfeed changes. It's interesting in that Zuck and Bloomgerg (really news media in general) are both much more powerful than each other in different ways. Zuck can change an algorithm and completely disrupt the flow of clicks. But he can't effectively attack someone's image the way Bloomberg is attacking his right now.

mtgx 9y ago
On the other hand, Bloomberg can't block a single user from reading its articles, like Zuck blocked the whistleblower from the platform for no good reason other than revenge. This is one area where we definitely need some regulation. And I think people who have complained about Google account bans in the past would agree. These companies are getting too powerful and connected to too many things and services to simply be allowed to remove someone's access on a whim, without a strong justification for it and without also being able to appeal the move to authorities, if needed. Ideally, this wouldn't be needed if the internet was more decentralized and these companies didn't try to be everywhere and own everything. But since they love that monopoly power so much, then the regulation is required.
- mc32 9y ago
  Yes, but while we all love the first amendment when it's something like this, people will go to great lengths to point out corps are not subject to it when it would protect an undesirable element with unpopular opinions.
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]
braderhart 9y ago
Zuckerberg has all the power in the media despite whatever people may say about him. He could determine tomorrow that he wants to publicly announce that he supports federated and decentralized services, blockchain voting and elections, marijuana legalization, housing for everyone, free tuition, etc. He could literally start a revolution with the money and power he has.
Alex3917 9y ago
> I guess they've got an axe to grind after what he did to them with the newsfeed changes. This. This whole scandal is basically a fake story invented by the media as revenge. FB has clearly done some things to get where they are that many would find challenging, but in the end if Facebook has an achilles heel then it can only be Facebook itself.
- mudil 9y ago
  It's not fake scandal. The real scandal is that Facebook and Google collect more data on free citizens than KGB has ever dreamed possible. Blatant invasion of privacy and data collection by Google and FB is a national security issue, as recent events have shown. Orwellian!
zmitri 9y ago
Bloomberg makes all of their money from terminal and data services. In terms of the business model, the consumer news service is basically a vanity project, so I don't think they are that concerned with what newsfeed changes have done to them.
ReverseCold 9y ago
> But he can't effectively attack someone's image the way Bloomberg is attacking his right now. If you were in control of Facebook you could do a whole lot more than attack one person's image.

mtgx 9y ago

On the other hand, Bloomberg can't block a single user from reading its articles, like Zuck blocked the whistleblower from the platform for no good reason other than revenge. This is one area where we definitely need some regulation. And I think people who have complained about Google account bans in the past would agree. These companies are getting too powerful and connected to too many things and services to simply be allowed to remove someone's access on a whim, without a strong justification for it and without also being able to appeal the move to authorities, if needed. Ideally, this wouldn't be needed if the internet was more decentralized and these companies didn't try to be everywhere and own everything. But since they love that monopoly power so much, then the regulation is required.

mc32 9y ago
Yes, but while we all love the first amendment when it's something like this, people will go to great lengths to point out corps are not subject to it when it would protect an undesirable element with unpopular opinions.

deleted 9y ago

[deleted]

braderhart 9y ago

Zuckerberg has all the power in the media despite whatever people may say about him. He could determine tomorrow that he wants to publicly announce that he supports federated and decentralized services, blockchain voting and elections, marijuana legalization, housing for everyone, free tuition, etc. He could literally start a revolution with the money and power he has.

Alex3917 9y ago

> I guess they've got an axe to grind after what he did to them with the newsfeed changes. This. This whole scandal is basically a fake story invented by the media as revenge. FB has clearly done some things to get where they are that many would find challenging, but in the end if Facebook has an achilles heel then it can only be Facebook itself.

mudil 9y ago
It's not fake scandal. The real scandal is that Facebook and Google collect more data on free citizens than KGB has ever dreamed possible. Blatant invasion of privacy and data collection by Google and FB is a national security issue, as recent events have shown. Orwellian!

zmitri 9y ago

Bloomberg makes all of their money from terminal and data services. In terms of the business model, the consumer news service is basically a vanity project, so I don't think they are that concerned with what newsfeed changes have done to them.

ReverseCold 9y ago

> But he can't effectively attack someone's image the way Bloomberg is attacking his right now. If you were in control of Facebook you could do a whole lot more than attack one person's image.