Thanks for playing into the story that Facebook created to set the conversation. This was openly covered last year by BBC when they interviewed Trump's digital

Thanks for playing into the story that Facebook created to set the conversation. This was openly covered last year by BBC when they interviewed Trump's digital campaign manager at the time Theresa Hong [interview linked]. The campaign spent $16M on Facebook. Understandably, Facebook gave them the white glove treatment, even had their own employees embedded in Project Alamo (the headquarters of the campaign's digital arm). But today Facebook claims they had no idea who one of their multi-million-dollar clients in 2015-2016 were. That it was just some random quiz-making hacker dude selling data to some other random company. https://twitter.com/bbcstories/status/896752720522100742?lang=en https://twitter.com/bbcstories/status/896752720522100742?lan... This piece of work posted today by Facebook is what we call damage control. Don't expect the truth from it-- it will contain truths, but it will not be the truth of the matter. And don't let it set your dialogue, man.