So someone is trying to get journalisim to be branded as “traditional media” now. The implication is “old and busted”, when in reality they have modern widely

So someone is trying to get journalisim to be branded as “traditional media” now. The implication is “old and busted”, when in reality they have modern widely distributed websites which are as contemporary as any alternative medias being inferred ... which are what exactly? Twitter? “Journalism media” seems to be an appropriate counter.