2 ms·
It’s worse than that: 4) researcher is a serial p-hacker who even boasted about the practice 5) reason given for the small sample (most recipes had changed) w
by Tloewald 9y ago
It’s worse than that:
4) researcher is a serial p-hacker who even boasted about the practice
5) reason given for the small sample (most recipes had changed) was a lie and sample appears to have been cherry-picked
- throwa_way_ 9y agoHe didn't just boast about p-hacking. He emailed his grad students telling them to p-hack more!