Please, mind that the camera does not have the same dynamic range a healthy person has. There are also other subtle signals that humans can use that computers w

Please, mind that the camera does not have the same dynamic range a healthy person has. There are also other subtle signals that humans can use that computers will still have problems using. I have personally avoided few collisions with pedestrians just on the fact that they occluded some far away light or on very subtle flicker of some part of their clothing. I don't see how car relying solely on vision (it does not seem to react to the pedestrian as if it was "seeing in the dark") can replace human with the current level of technology. If this is true and the car was not able to use LIDAR/Radar/IR camera etc. to augment its visible spectrum then I don't think it should have been allowed for this car to be driven fully autonomously.