Interesting article with good points, but some of it is pretty silly: > To be fair, “Testing Robustness” is followed by a written comment indicating that a “pe

Interesting article with good points, but some of it is pretty silly: > To be fair, “Testing Robustness” is followed by a written comment indicating that a “person (not shown) drives the robot up to the door, points the hand at the door handle, then gives the ‘GO’ command, both at the beginning of the video and again at 42 seconds.” The rest of the time the robot presumably executes its routine without human intervention. But this kind of task-and-time-limited autonomy has been around for decades, while few people know what “driving” the robot to the lab door means or that a teleoperator is necessary for nearly all of its movements. Come on. We know how to make robots that walk to doors. The whole point of the video is to show the robustness of the robot in attempting to open the door. I couldn’t care less if someone drove it to the door then started the program.