3 ms·
I think that instead of trying to create a tsunami, it might be slightly more effective to drive one straight into a port/city, and detonate at the surface. Ne
by tgsovlerkhgsel 9y ago
I think that instead of trying to create a tsunami, it might be slightly more effective to drive one straight into a port/city, and detonate at the surface.
New York: https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?t=a1c1cd0eeccb2488024ace3456c44d36 https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?t=a1c1cd0eeccb2488024ace...
San Francisco: https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?&kt=100000&lat=37.7470957&lng=-122.5095451&airburst=0&hob_ft=0&ff=52&psi=20,5,1&zm=9 https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?&kt=100000&lat=37.747095...
- rdtsc 9y agoAh makes sense. So it is more about delivering it closer to the shore so it can't be as easily detected than creating tsunami waves as the main mechanism of destruction.
- nerpderp83 9y agoWhy wouldn't you just use Fedex, DHL or an intermodal shipper?
- rdtsc 9y agoYou joke but they have an intermodal shipping container missile. You can buy it if you have some extra cash laying around: http://roe.ru/eng/catalog/naval-systems/shipborne-weapons/klab-k/ http://roe.ru/eng/catalog/naval-systems/shipborne-weapons/kl...