> Beatles solo careers are prime victims of this unfortunate standard. Quite true. Each Beatle's solo albums always had 2-3 good to great songs. This is pret

> Beatles solo careers are prime victims of this unfortunate standard. Quite true. Each Beatle's solo albums always had 2-3 good to great songs. This is pretty much what each would bring to a Beatles album too, but collectively, that would give them 6-10 really great tracks per album. They never could possibly deliver entire albums of greatness (or even "really good"ness) year after year individually. Put another way, each Beatles album could be looked at as a 'best of' each member at that point in time. A "greatest hits" collection every 6 months or so, really. But no one person would be able to keep that pace (even they couldn't, eventually).