There are two points that I wished were addressed more often. 1. New researchers. The examples he mentions include researchers who were already important in th

There are two points that I wished were addressed more often. 1. New researchers. The examples he mentions include researchers who were already important in the field, and whose prestige guarantees review. But if you're a new researcher, good luck getting noticed. Blind review doesn't have this problem. 2. The cost of journals. People say "journal" and think of Elsevier, but there are several journals and conferences that publish all papers for free. The ACL, the largest conference on computational linguistics, finances itself with the entry fee to their conference, and you can read all of their papers right now (disclaimer: I'm currently doing work for them). There is a middle ground between Elsevier and Arxiv.