The company isn't a court "alleged" is plenty enough for the company to look at the communication system it pays for to figure out what is going on. It has a c

The company isn't a court "alleged" is plenty enough for the company to look at the communication system it pays for to figure out what is going on. It has a communication system to communicate about business. > And now with this, they'll use a different communication method that you dont have access to and now youre back to square one. The best you can hope for is that theyre ignorant of these changes so you can catch them. Good, then its security and HR's problem. We tell everyone we own the communications systems (its even in the employee handbook). > ah, guilty until proven innocent Yep. Welcome to the corporate environment in the US. Frankly, if they think you used the company e-mail / Slack to do your activity then I don't think we are dealing with Moriarty here. > but you shouldnt assume that communications that the user doesnt want the company to be privy to is necessarily malicious or illegal. Then use your own non-company communication system (e.g. text, home e-mail) or go to lunch - how hard is that?