3 ms·
I'd argue that it's more of a culture problem. I regularly have multiple instances of Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code open (together with many windows expl
by meuk 9y ago
I'd argue that it's more of a culture problem. I regularly have multiple instances of Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code open (together with many windows explorer, notepad, notepad++ and whatever). Visual Studio in itself is just slow, and often crashes, even if I just have one instance open.
On Linux, I have several terminals open, which is just so much more lightweight.
Of course, from a performance point-of-view, these are not comparable, but that is exactly my point. On windows, everything has a GUI, and everything seems to assume a much more hi-end machine.
P.S. I admit that it was a bit misleading to post this rant under this article, since the article measures raw OS performance, while my point is that lower performance is usually sufficient too, if you use tools that have a single purpose instead of trying to be an OS in itself.
- justin66 9y agoSome of it's culture and some is certainly bloat. VS has slowed down a lot in the last eight years, and VS Code was born slow. But the performance between the RPi and the Windows machine shouldn't be comparable at all, and if the RPi is coming out ahead for anything more trivial than opening a terminal window, I'd look at the setup of the Windows machine. There is plenty that can get effed up there.