2 ms·

The dailymail, really?

• gadders 9y ago
  Are you saying the tweets in the article are not genuine or the article is untrue? It would probably be better if you engaged with the content of the story rather than virtue signal.
  • wnevets 9y ago
    If a dailymail story about facebook giving data they own to obama is the best you can do, you've only proven my point.
    • gadders 9y ago
      Did you even read the story? It contains screenshots of tweets from the Carol Davidsen, Media Director at Obama for America. Do those screenshots magically become true when reproduced on a different website? The fact that you can only complain about the website I linked to, rather than the substance of the story, only proves my point. But here, have a link from somewhere else: Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2018/03/19/why-are-we-only-now-talking-about-facebook-and-elections/#6ba2ab483839 https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2018/03/19/why-are... Twitter: https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975568130117459975 https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975568130117459975
  • wnevets 9y ago
    CA sold stolen data. CA paid out bribes to win elections. Why are you bringing up facebook giving away data that they own?
    • gadders 9y ago
      Facebook gave preferential access to data, breaching their own ToS, to a political party they supported.